Cashew nut classification turns on essential character and specific tariff entries, with roasting placing goods under heading 2008.

Cashew nuts are classified by their essential character and the most specific tariff entry, not by a residuary heading. Nitrogen-packed provisionally preserved cashew nuts were treated as fresh-preserving packaging rather than provisional preservation, so they fell under heading 0801 as dried nuts, specifically CTI 08013210. Roasted cashew nuts were held to undergo a preparation process covered by heading 2008 and classified under CTI 08081910. Shelled diced cashew nuts were also treated as dried cashew kernels within heading 0801, with the claimed diced-versus-broken distinction rejected in favour of the specific broken-kernel entry, not the residuary classification.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether provisionally preserved cashew nuts treated with nitrogen are classifiable under heading 0801 or heading 0812; (ii) Whether roasted cashew nuts are classifiable under heading 2008; (iii) Whether shelled diced cashew nuts are classifiable under heading 0801 and, if so, under which tariff item.

Issue (i): Whether provisionally preserved cashew nuts treated with nitrogen are classifiable under heading 0801 or heading 0812.

Analysis: Classification was determined by applying Rule 1 and the relevant chapter notes. Heading 0812 applies only where fruit or nuts are treated solely for provisional preservation during transport or storage and remain unsuitable for immediate consumption. Nitrogen packing used here was found to be only a freshness-preserving packaging method and not a preservative solution of the kind contemplated by Chapter Note 4 to Chapter 8. The goods retained the character of dried nuts and were treated as cashew nuts packed with nitrogen, which was held to fall within heading 0801.

Conclusion: The issue was answered against classification under heading 0812 and in favour of classification under heading 0801, specifically CTI 08013210.

Issue (ii): Whether roasted cashew nuts are classifiable under heading 2008.

Analysis: Roasting was treated as a distinct process from drying or provisional preservation. The heading structure of Chapter 8 does not cover roasting, while heading 2008 covers nuts otherwise prepared or preserved, including dry-roasted, oil-roasted, or fat-roasted nuts according to the HSN explanatory guidance. The roasted goods were found to undergo a preparation process that materially changed their physical and chemical characteristics, placing them within Chapter 20.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of classification under heading 2008, specifically CTI 20081910.

Issue (iii): Whether shelled diced cashew nuts are classifiable under heading 0801 and, if so, under which tariff item.

Analysis: The goods were held to be shelled cashew nuts that remained dried nuts within Chapter 8. The claimed distinction between diced and broken pieces was rejected on the basis of trade parlance, the ordinary meaning of broken, the tariff structure, and the absence of any separate tariff entry for diced cashew kernels. The products were treated as falling within the specific broken-cashew-kernel entry rather than the residuary entry.

Conclusion: The issue was decided against the residuary classification claimed by the applicant and in favour of classification under heading 0801, specifically CTI 08013210.

Final Conclusion: The ruling accepted the classification proposed for roasted cashew nuts, but rejected the claimed classifications for provisionally preserved cashew nuts and shelled diced cashew nuts, which were both placed under the broken-cashew-kernel entry in Chapter 8.

Ratio Decidendi: For tariff purposes, a product is classified by its essential character and the specific heading that best describes it, and a residuary entry cannot be used where the tariff contains a more specific provision covering the goods.

---