Second appeal challenging civil findings-whether it raised a 'substantial question of law'; SLP dismissed, appeal rejection upheld. The dominant issue was whether the HC was correct in holding that the appellant's second appeal did not raise any 'substantial question of law' and was ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Second appeal challenging civil findings-whether it raised a "substantial question of law"; SLP dismissed, appeal rejection upheld.
The dominant issue was whether the HC was correct in holding that the appellant's second appeal did not raise any "substantial question of law" and was therefore not maintainable. The SC found no legal infirmity or compelling ground to interfere with the HC's determination that the issues urged were not substantial questions of law warranting appellate scrutiny. Consequently, the SC declined to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction and dismissed the SLP, leaving the HC's dismissal of the appeal undisturbed.
After hearing counsel and perusing the material on record, the Court held that there was "no good ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court." Accordingly, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed. Any pending application(s), if filed, were also disposed of.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.