https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783707 The dominant issue was whether the HC was correct in holding that the appellant's second appeal did not raise any "substantial question of law" and was therefore not maintainable. The SC found no legal infirmity or compelling ground to interfere with the HC's determination that the issues urged were not substantial questions of law warranting appellate scrutiny. Consequently, the SC declined to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction and dismissed the SLP, leaving the HC's dismissal of the appeal undisturbed. en-us Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Dec 2025 07:49:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783707 The dominant issue was whether the HC was correct in holding that the appellant's second appeal did not raise any "substantial question of law" and was therefore not maintainable. The SC found no legal infirmity or compelling ground to interfere with the HC's determination that the issues urged were not substantial questions of law warranting appellate scrutiny. Consequently, the SC declined to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction and dismissed the SLP, leaving the HC's dismissal of the appeal undisturbed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783707