Reimported goods identity established for exemption where tyres and tubes matched the earlier export consignment.

The identity of reimported tyres and tubes was established as the same goods earlier exported in a tractor consignment, because invoices, packing list, examination report, markings on the goods, and supplier reference all supported that link. The view that exemption under Notification No. 94/96-Cus. required reimport of the entire tractor was rejected as ignoring the commercial reality of a partial rejection of goods. On that basis, the notification condition that the reimported goods be the same as the exported goods was satisfied, and denial of exemption was unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the identity of the reimported tyres and tubes as the same goods earlier exported along with tractors in semi knocked down condition was established so as to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 94/96-Cus. dated 16.12.1996.

Analysis: The goods exported were tractors in SKD condition, but the record showed that the disputed reimported goods were the identifiable tyres and tubes forming part of that consignment. The invoices, packing list, examination report, markings on the goods, and supplier reference supported the claim that the returned goods were the same tyres and tubes earlier exported from India. The insistence that the entire tractor must be reimported ignored the commercial reality of a partial rejection of goods and the notification requirement that the goods reimported must be the same as those exported.

Conclusion: The identity of the reimported goods was satisfactorily established, and the denial of exemption was unsustainable.

---