Penalty u/s 271B deleted as only commission, not full freight in Form 26AS, counts for s.44AB audit

The ITAT Rajkot allowed the assessee's appeal and deleted the penalty imposed u/s 271B. It held that for the purposes of s.44AB, only the assessee's commission income, and not the entire freight amounts routed through its accounts and reflected in Form 26AS, constituted "gross receipts." The Tribunal accepted that the assessee functioned merely as a commission agent, passing on the bulk freight to transporters and retaining only commission. As the commission income did not exceed the statutory threshold under s.44AB, tax audit was not mandatory and penalty u/s 271B was unsustainable.

---

---

1. ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED

1.1 Whether, on the facts, the amounts reflected in Form 26AS represented the assessee's "total sales/turnover/gross receipts" for the purposes of section 44AB, or only pass-through amounts in a commission agency business, such that only the commission income constituted "gross receipts".

1.2 Depending on the answer to Issue 1.1, whether the assessee was liable to tax audit under section 44AB and, consequently, whether penalty under section 271B was leviable.

2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Issue 1: Characterisation of receipts for purposes of section 44AB and liability to penalty under section 271B

Legal framework (as discussed)

2.1 The Tribunal noted that section 44AB requires an audit only if the assessee's "total sales/turnover/gross receipts" exceed the prescribed monetary threshold. If commission income is below that threshold, tax audit is not applicable and no penalty under section 271B can be levied.

Interpretation and reasoning

2.2 The assessee consistently maintained that he was merely a commission agent in the transportation business. As per the prevailing custom, the assessee received freight amounts from clients, passed over the same amounts to counterparties (truck owners), and retained only a fixed commission per consignment.

2.3 The Tribunal accepted that the amounts credited and reflected in Form 26AS represented sums temporarily routed through the assessee in his capacity as an intermediary and not his own turnover. The fact that such amounts appeared in Form 26AS against the assessee's PAN did not, by itself, convert those sums into his "total sales/turnover/gross receipts".

2.4 On this factual and functional characterization, the Tribunal treated only the commission component earned by the assessee as his "gross receipts" for purposes of section 44AB.

2.5 Since the commission income was below the monetary threshold prescribed under section 44AB, the basic triggering condition for compulsory tax audit was held to be absent.

Conclusions

2.6 The amount of Rs. 1,11,60,365/- reflected in Form 26AS did not constitute the assessee's "total sales/turnover/gross receipts"; only the commission income was relevant for section 44AB.

2.7 As the commission income was below the statutory threshold, the assessee was not liable to get accounts audited under section 44AB.

2.8 In the absence of a statutory obligation to obtain audit under section 44AB, the precondition for imposition of penalty under section 271B was not satisfied. The penalty levied under section 271B was therefore unsustainable and was deleted.

---