Shore tank quantity, not transaction quantity, for specific customs duty; demurrage excluded from assessable value under Section 14
CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appeal filed by the importer of bulk liquid cargo. It held that, in terms of binding departmental circulars, where customs duty is specific, the assessable quantity must be the shore tank receipt quantity and not the total transaction quantity. The Tribunal further held that demurrage charges incurred after the arrival of the goods at the Indian port are post-importation expenses and therefore not includible in the assessable value for customs duty. Consequently, the appellant is liable to pay customs duty only on the shore tank receipt quantity, excluding demurrage from the assessable value.
1. ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED
1.1 Whether, in the case of bulk liquid cargo where customs duty is specific, the quantity for levy of duty is to be taken as the shore tank receipt quantity or the discharged quantity at the port.
1.2 Whether demurrage charges incurred after arrival of goods at the Indian port are includible in the assessable value for levy of customs duty.
1.3 Whether, for the relevant period after 01.03.2008, the correct rate and structure of duty on imported High Speed Diesel was a purely specific rate per litre, or a combination of ad valorem duty plus a lower specific duty.
2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS
Issue 1: Basis of quantity for levy of customs duty on bulk liquid cargo where duty is specific
Legal framework (as discussed)
2.1 The Court referred to Circular No. 96/2002 dated 27.12.2002, providing that, in case of bulk liquid cargo imports, whether for home consumption or warehousing, the shore tank receipt quantity should be taken as the basis for levy of customs duty.
2.2 The Court also referred to Circular No. 06/2006 dated 12.01.2006, which directed that import duty on liquid cargo in bulk shall be levied on the transaction value; where duty is specific, it shall be levied on shore tank receipt quantity; where duty is ad valorem, it shall be levied on the transaction value irrespective of quantity received on shore.
2.3 The Court relied on the ratio laid down in earlier decisions, including its own prior order in the same assessee's case and the decision of the Apex Court in the matter concerning bulk liquid cargo, holding that only the quantity actually received into the shore tank should be the basis for duty.
Interpretation and reasoning
2.4 The Court noted that the dispute concerned the quantity on which customs duty was to be calculated: shore tank receipt quantity versus the discharged quantity at the port.
2.5 It observed that the CBEC circulars, read together, make a clear distinction between specific duty and ad valorem duty. For specific duty, the basis is shore tank receipt quantity; for ad valorem duty, the basis is the transaction value irrespective of quantity received.
2.6 It was an admitted position that, in the present case, the customs duty was of a specific nature. Therefore, as per the explicit mandate of Circular No. 06/2006 and consistent with Circular No. 96/2002, the duty had to be levied on the quantity actually received in shore tanks.
2.7 The Court further relied on its own earlier order in the same assessee's matter, where, following the Apex Court, it had held that the quantity actually received into the shore tank in India alone should form the basis for payment of customs duty in the case of bulk liquid cargo.
Conclusions
2.8 The Court held that, since the duty in the present case is specific, customs duty is required to be levied on the shore tank receipt quantity and not on the discharged quantity or on any other basis.
2.9 The assessments made on any basis other than shore tank receipt quantity were held to be unsustainable to that extent and required reassessment accordingly.
Issue 2: Includibility of demurrage charges in assessable value
Legal framework (as discussed)
2.10 The Court referred to the decision of the Apex Court which held that demurrage charges, being incurred after the goods have reached Indian ports, constitute a post-importation event and cannot form part of the transaction value.
2.11 The Court also referred to the prior decision wherein the same principle was applied, namely that demurrage is not includible in the assessable value as it is incurred post importation.
Interpretation and reasoning
2.12 It was undisputed that the demurrage charges in question were incurred only after the goods had reached the Indian port.
2.13 Applying the ratio of the Apex Court, the Court reasoned that such demurrage is a post-importation expense and, by its very nature, falls outside the scope of the transaction value that is to be adopted for customs assessment.
2.14 Consequently, the inclusion of prorated demurrage charges in the assessable value by the adjudicating authority was contrary to the law as settled by the Apex Court and by the Tribunal in the cited decisions.
Conclusions
2.15 Demurrage charges incurred after arrival of the goods at the Indian port are post-importation expenses and are not includible in the assessable value for the purpose of levy of customs duty.
2.16 The Court held that the demurrage charges included by the adjudicating authority in the assessable value must be excluded, and the duty liability recalculated after such exclusion.
Issue 3: Correct rate and structure of duty on High Speed Diesel after 01.03.2008
Legal framework (as discussed)
2.17 The Court noted the effect of the Finance Act, 2008, whereby with effect from 01.03.2008, the ad valorem component of the CVD on unbranded diesel was abolished and the specific duty component was enhanced to Rs. 2.60 per litre.
Interpretation and reasoning
2.18 In the specific appeal relating to a bill of entry dated 07.03.2008, the adjudicating authority had levied duty by charging an ad valorem duty at 6% plus a specific duty of Rs. 1.25 per litre.
2.19 The Court found that, in light of the change effective from 01.03.2008, the correct levy should consist solely of specific duty at the rate of Rs. 2.60 per litre, without the ad valorem component.
2.20 The Court held that the application of an ad valorem rate in addition to a lower specific duty was inconsistent with the prevailing statutory regime after 01.03.2008.
Conclusions
2.21 For High Speed Diesel imported under the bill of entry dated 07.03.2008, the correct duty is payable at the specific rate of Rs. 2.60 per litre only, without any ad valorem component.
2.22 The Court directed the adjudicating authority to reassess the relevant bills of entry by levying duty on the shore tank receipt quantity, excluding demurrage from the assessable value, and applying the specific duty rate of Rs. 2.60 per litre for the period after 01.03.2008.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter ✕
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
