Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether continued detention of petitioner's gold chain is permissible where no show cause notice under Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962 was issued and an alleged oral waiver of SCN and personal hearing was relied upon by the Customs Department; and whether the goods must be released when the statutory period under Section 110(2) has lapsed without extension.
Analysis: The determination focusses on the statutory requirement to issue a show cause notice under Section 124 and to afford a personal hearing, and the effect of an alleged oral waiver. Section 108 recording and reliance on an oral waiver cannot replace the formal issuance of SCN and the opportunity of hearing required by law. Precedent establishes that printed or oral waivers do not satisfy Section 124 and that natural justice requires a proper opportunity to be afforded. Separately, Section 110(2) prescribes a six-month period for issuing notice relating to detained goods; absence of issuance within this period and lack of a valid extension renders continued detention impermissible. The Supreme Court authority cited confirms that non-issuance of required notice within statutory time results in return or release of the goods.
Conclusion: The detention of the gold chain is unlawful. The petitioner is entitled to release of the gold chain for re-export subject to payment of warehousing charges; the petition is allowed and disposed of in those terms.