Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the expenditure incurred on procurement of premium CAD software was capital in nature or allowable as revenue expenditure, and the consequential effect on deduction under section 80IC of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The software had a short useful life and required continuous upgradation. On that basis, it did not confer an enduring benefit of the kind that would justify capital treatment. The disallowance made by the lower authorities, along with the restricted depreciation approach, was not accepted.
Conclusion: The expenditure of Rs. 25,94,500 was held to be revenue expenditure, and the assessee was held entitled to the consequential benefit in computation under section 80IC.