Special Leave Petitions restored and governed by Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal (3-10-2024); assessing officers to apply its principles The SC held the Special Leave Petitions fall within the principles laid down in the 3-10-2024 decision in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal; assessees are ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Special Leave Petitions restored and governed by Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal (3-10-2024); assessing officers to apply its principles
The SC held the Special Leave Petitions fall within the principles laid down in the 3-10-2024 decision in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal; assessees are to be governed by that judgment and assessing officers must decide objections in accordance with the law as articulated therein. The Court allowed the application for restoration of the SLP, noting the Revenue's counsel had no objection, and restored the petition to its original number for further prosecution consistent with the referred judgment and legal directions.
Application by the applicant (Seth Iron and Steel Pvt. Limited) seeking restoration of Special Leave Petition (Civil) (Diary) No.35709/2025 was considered. The learned counsel for the respondents stated he had "no objection if the SLP is restored." On that basis the application was allowed and the Special Leave Petition was "restored to its original number on the file." The Miscellaneous Application was disposed of. The matter is to be listed after two weeks.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
