<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1010 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781542</link>
    <description>The SC held the Special Leave Petitions fall within the principles laid down in the 3-10-2024 decision in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal; assessees are to be governed by that judgment and assessing officers must decide objections in accordance with the law as articulated therein. The Court allowed the application for restoration of the SLP, noting the Revenue&#039;s counsel had no objection, and restored the petition to its original number for further prosecution consistent with the referred judgment and legal directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 08:36:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1010 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781542</link>
      <description>The SC held the Special Leave Petitions fall within the principles laid down in the 3-10-2024 decision in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal; assessees are to be governed by that judgment and assessing officers must decide objections in accordance with the law as articulated therein. The Court allowed the application for restoration of the SLP, noting the Revenue&#039;s counsel had no objection, and restored the petition to its original number for further prosecution consistent with the referred judgment and legal directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>