Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether GST liability on reinsurance services availed for the period from 01.07.2017 to 24.01.2018 stood regularized by the subsequent circular and whether the impugned orders could be sustained.
Analysis: The dispute concerned reinsurance services relating to insurance schemes covered by serial nos. 35 and 36 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT(R) dated 28.06.2017. A later circular issued on 15.07.2024, based on the GST Council's recommendation, regularized the GST liability for the relevant period on an 'as is where is' basis. Since the impugned adjudication and appellate orders were passed before issuance of the circular, they did not consider the later clarification. The circular was held to be applicable to the petitioner, and the earlier coordinate bench view was followed.
Conclusion: The subsequent circular applied to the disputed period, and the demand orders could not be sustained. The impugned order-in-original and order-in-appeal were set aside, and the petitioner was granted the benefit of the circular.