Reassessment without fresh tangible material fails where the same facts were already examined in the earlier assessment.

Reopening under section 147 was held unsustainable because the Revenue relied on the same material already examined in the earlier assessment, including unsecured loans and confirmations considered during search-related and section 153A proceedings. No fresh tangible material was shown to justify issuance of notice under section 148, and the first proviso to section 147 barred reassessment on the existing record. The reassessment notice and proceedings were quashed, and the challenge succeeded in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the reassessment notice and proceedings under section 147/148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were valid in the absence of fresh tangible material and in light of the first proviso to section 147.

Analysis: The assessment records showed that the original return had been filed after search proceedings, section 153A proceedings had been initiated, and the regular assessment had already examined the relevant unsecured loans and confirmations on the basis of seized material and a specific questionnaire. On these facts, no fresh tangible material was shown to justify reopening. The Revenue did not rebut the material factual position that the reassessment was founded on the same material already considered in the earlier assessment.

Conclusion: The reopening was invalid and was quashed; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the reassessment challenge was accepted, rendering the remaining issues academic.

Ratio Decidendi: Reassessment under section 147 cannot be sustained in the absence of fresh tangible material where the relevant facts and material were already examined in the earlier assessment.

---