<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1660 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779171</link>
    <description>Reopening under section 147 was held unsustainable because the Revenue relied on the same material already examined in the earlier assessment, including unsecured loans and confirmations considered during search-related and section 153A proceedings. No fresh tangible material was shown to justify issuance of notice under section 148, and the first proviso to section 147 barred reassessment on the existing record. The reassessment notice and proceedings were quashed, and the challenge succeeded in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 08:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1660 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779171</link>
      <description>Reopening under section 147 was held unsustainable because the Revenue relied on the same material already examined in the earlier assessment, including unsecured loans and confirmations considered during search-related and section 153A proceedings. No fresh tangible material was shown to justify issuance of notice under section 148, and the first proviso to section 147 barred reassessment on the existing record. The reassessment notice and proceedings were quashed, and the challenge succeeded in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>