Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cancellation of GST registration could be considered for restoration where the registered person subsequently filed the pending returns and paid the tax dues with applicable interest and late fee under the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017.
Analysis: The cancellation had been made on the ground of continuous non-filing of returns for six months under Section 29(2)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017. The proviso to Rule 22(4) permits the proper officer to drop the cancellation proceedings and pass the prescribed order where the person, instead of replying to the notice, furnishes all pending returns and makes full payment of the tax dues together with applicable interest and late fee. Since cancellation of registration carries serious civil consequences, the appropriate course was to permit the petitioner to approach the competent authority with compliance of the stated conditions and seek restoration in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The petitioner was permitted to apply before the competent authority for restoration of GST registration within the time granted by the Court, and the authority was directed to consider restoration if the conditions under Rule 22(4) were satisfied.