Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods manufactured and used within the factory for repair and maintenance of plant and machinery, and for construction of internal roads and fencing facilitating movement of raw materials and operation of the plant, qualified for exemption under the captive consumption notifications.
Analysis: The goods on which duty was demanded were used either in repair and maintenance of existing plant and machinery engaged in manufacture of final products, or by the Plant Civil Engineering Department for construction of roads and fencing within the plant. Such internal roads and related structures enabled transportation of inputs and materials to the production units and were found to be integral to the manufacturing activity. The fact that the goods were also used for departmental or ancillary purposes did not disqualify them where their dominant use was in or in relation to manufacture. The reasoning was supported by the principle that infrastructure inside the plant, when inseparable from production and necessary for commercial production, forms part of the manufacturing process.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to the benefit of the exemption notifications, and the demand, interest, and penalty were unsustainable.