TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Orissa HC sets aside penalty recovery order grants final hearing opportunity despite time-barred appeal</h1> The Orissa HC set aside a penalty recovery order despite the petitioner having participated in personal hearing and losing appeal rights due to time ... Recovery of penalty - petitioner not only was represented at personal hearing, he has also lost his right of appeal by efflux of time - HELD THAT:- Sequence of events regarding petitioner’s hospitalization, issuance of demand-cum-show-cause notice resulting in the order passed, move us to interfere. This is only because petitioner is required to have one last opportunity of representing his case before the authority. If he again suffers ill health requiring hospitalization or otherwise, which will be unfortunate but, same cannot be agitated any more. Impugned order is set aside. Petitioner will forthwith communicate certified copy of this order to the authority, on or before 30th December, 2024. Omission to do so will automatically restore impugned order. In event of communication, the authority will fix date of hearing as one further opportunity to petitioner and proceed to adjudicate and pass order afresh. Petition disposed off. The Orissa High Court, through ARINDAM SINHA and M.S. SAHOO, JJ., addressed a writ petition challenging the order-in-original dated 13th December 2023 issued pursuant to a demand-cum-show-cause notice dated 17th August 2023 for recovery of penalty. The petitioner's advocate submitted that due to petitioner's hospitalization from 22nd April to 6th June 2023 and again from 15th October 2023 to 17th March 2024, and serious illness in between, the petitioner was unable to effectively represent his case, despite his accountant attending the personal hearing. The revenue contended that the petitioner was represented and had lost the right of appeal by efflux of time. The Court, considering the petitioner's health-related circumstances, interfered with the impugned order solely to grant 'one last opportunity' to represent his case before the authority. The Court set aside the impugned order and directed the petitioner to communicate a certified copy of the order to the authority by 30th December 2024, warning that failure to do so 'will automatically restore impugned order.' Upon such communication, the authority shall grant a further hearing and adjudicate afresh. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
