<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 1320 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775252</link>
    <description>The Orissa HC set aside the impugned order-in-original and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication because the petitioner&#039;s illness and hospitalization had prevented an effective defence before the authority. Accepting that proper representation had not been possible, the Court granted one further opportunity of hearing and directed the adjudicating authority to fix a fresh date on timely communication of the order and decide the case afresh.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 08:25:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=837686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 1320 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775252</link>
      <description>The Orissa HC set aside the impugned order-in-original and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication because the petitioner&#039;s illness and hospitalization had prevented an effective defence before the authority. Accepting that proper representation had not been possible, the Court granted one further opportunity of hearing and directed the adjudicating authority to fix a fresh date on timely communication of the order and decide the case afresh.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=775252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>