Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notice issued under section 148 for Assessment Year 2017-18 was valid when prior approval was taken from the Principal Commissioner instead of the authority specified under section 151(ii); and whether the reassessment initiation could survive on that basis.
Analysis: The notice was issued after three years from the end of the relevant assessment year. Under the new reassessment regime, the specified authority for issuing a notice under section 148 in such a case is the Principal Chief Commissioner or the equivalent higher authority under section 151(ii). The notice itself recorded approval from the Principal Commissioner, and that approval was not disputed. Since the statutory requirement of sanction from the proper authority was not met, the notice suffered from a legal infirmity. Once the notice was held invalid, examination of the merits of the addition became unnecessary.
Conclusion: The notice under section 148 was quashed for want of approval by the appropriate authority, and the challenge of the assessee succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where reassessment notice under the new regime is issued after the prescribed period, sanction must be obtained from the authority mandated by section 151(ii); approval by a lower authority does not cure the defect and renders the notice invalid.