Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order passed under Section 73 of the GST Act and the appellate order dismissing the appeal as time-barred were sustainable where the reply and defence were not properly considered and no effective hearing was afforded.
Analysis: The order under Section 73 was found to be short of the requirements of natural justice because it did not adequately deal with the petitioner's reply and proceeded on the footing that supporting evidence was absent, though the authority could have required production of such evidence. The appellate order was also set aside as it could not survive once the original adjudication was found defective.
Conclusion: The challenge succeeded. The adjudication order and the appellate order were quashed, and the matter was remanded for fresh decision after affording an opportunity of hearing.