<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 330 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774262</link>
    <description>An assessment order under the GST Act was held unsustainable for breach of natural justice because the authority did not properly consider the taxpayer&#039;s reply, proceeded on the assumption that supporting evidence was absent, and failed to afford an effective hearing. The appellate order was also set aside because it could not stand once the original adjudication was found defective. The High Court quashed both orders and remanded the matter for fresh decision after giving the taxpayer an opportunity to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2025 08:49:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=833932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 330 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774262</link>
      <description>An assessment order under the GST Act was held unsustainable for breach of natural justice because the authority did not properly consider the taxpayer&#039;s reply, proceeded on the assumption that supporting evidence was absent, and failed to afford an effective hearing. The appellate order was also set aside because it could not stand once the original adjudication was found defective. The High Court quashed both orders and remanded the matter for fresh decision after giving the taxpayer an opportunity to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>