Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, whose GST registration had been cancelled for non-filing of returns, was entitled to seek restoration of registration upon furnishing all pending returns and paying the tax dues with applicable interest and late fee.
Analysis: Cancellation under Section 29(2)(c) of the CGST framework is attracted where returns are not furnished for a continuous period of six months. The proviso to Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules permits the proper officer to drop the cancellation proceedings and issue the prescribed order where the taxpayer, instead of replying to the notice, furnishes all pending returns and makes full payment of tax dues along with applicable interest and late fee. In view of the serious civil consequences of cancellation, the petitioner was permitted to approach the competent authority for restoration on compliance with the prescribed requirements.
Conclusion: The petitioner was directed to apply for restoration of GST registration within the stipulated period, and the competent authority was directed to consider the request in accordance with law upon compliance with the proviso to Rule 22(4).