Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the accused was entitled to bail on the ground that the charge-sheet was not placed before the court within the statutory period, and whether the bar under the NDPS Act could defeat such entitlement.
Analysis: The application was for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in an NDPS prosecution. The Court found that the accused had been in custody since 07.05.2024, the statutory period expired on 02.11.2024, and although the charge-sheet had been despatched earlier, it was not placed before the court within time. The record showed that on the relevant dates no charge-sheet was before the court dealing with the bail matter, and the later delay in placing it could not be used to curtail the accused's accrued right. The Court treated the lapse as a technical and procedural failure on the part of the prosecution machinery and held that the accused's right to be released on bail could not be denied on that account, notwithstanding the seriousness of the NDPS allegations.
Conclusion: The accused was held entitled to bail and the application was allowed.