Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deemed credit was available on re-rollable iron and steel products received by the appellant under the relevant notification, and whether the department had proved that the inputs fell within the exception denying such credit.
Analysis: The notification granting deemed credit created a presumption that the procured goods were duty paid. Once such presumption operated, the burden lay on the department to show that the case was covered by the exception in the notification. No verification was made with the Central Excise authorities concerning the duty-paid or non-duty-paid nature of the inputs, and the department's assumption that receipt from manufacturers necessarily meant non-duty-paid goods was not supported by evidence.
Conclusion: Deemed credit was held to be available to the appellant, and the department failed to displace the statutory presumption.
Final Conclusion: The appellant succeeded on the credit issue, the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was set aside, and the original authority's order was restored.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a notification grants deemed credit, the presumption operates in favour of the assessee that the goods are duty paid, and the department must affirmatively prove that the case falls within the notification's exception.