<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 195 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77218</link>
    <description>A notification granting deemed credit on re-rollable iron and steel products raised a presumption that the inputs were duty paid, and the assessee could rely on that presumption unless the department proved that the goods fell within the notification&#039;s exception. The department did not verify the duty-paid or non-duty-paid character of the inputs with Central Excise authorities and relied only on the assumption that goods received from manufacturers were non-duty-paid. On that basis, deemed credit was allowed, the statutory presumption was not displaced, and the appellate order was set aside with restoration of the original authority&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 195 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77218</link>
      <description>A notification granting deemed credit on re-rollable iron and steel products raised a presumption that the inputs were duty paid, and the assessee could rely on that presumption unless the department proved that the goods fell within the notification&#039;s exception. The department did not verify the duty-paid or non-duty-paid character of the inputs with Central Excise authorities and relied only on the assumption that goods received from manufacturers were non-duty-paid. On that basis, deemed credit was allowed, the statutory presumption was not displaced, and the appellate order was set aside with restoration of the original authority&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>