Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1. Whether the delay in filing the audit report in prescribed Form 10BB, beyond the stipulated due date, results in denial of exemption under sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Whether the assessee is entitled to claim exemption under section 11 despite the belated filing of Form 10BB.
3. Whether the power to condone delay in filing Form 10BB lies exclusively with the Income Tax Officer under section 119(2) of the Act, and if so, whether the assessee was obligated to file a condonation petition before the revenue authorities.
Issue-wise Detailed Analysis
Issue 1: Effect of Delay in Filing Form 10BB on Claim of Exemption under Sections 11 and 12
The relevant legal framework includes sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act, which provide exemption to charitable trusts and societies on income applied for charitable purposes. Section 11(2) requires that income accumulated or set apart should be in accordance with prescribed conditions, including filing of audit reports in Form 10BB.
Precedents relied upon include the decisions of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in Sarvodaya Charitable Trust vs. ITO (Exemption), (2021) 125 taxmann.com 75, and the Jurisdictional High Court in CIT vs. Rai Bahadur Bissesswarlal Motilal Malwasie Trust, (1992) 195 ITR 825. Both judgments held that the filing of Form 10BB before one month prior to the due date of filing the return is not a mandatory condition for claiming exemption under sections 11 and 12. Even if the audit report is filed belatedly, the assessee remains entitled to exemption.
The Tribunal noted the undisputed facts that the assessee was duly registered under section 12A and that the accounts were audited by a Chartered Accountant. Although Form 10BB was not filed one month prior to the return filing date, it was uploaded along with the return and was available at the time of assessment processing under section 143(1).
The Tribunal interpreted the legal provisions and precedents to conclude that a mere delay in filing Form 10BB does not disentitle the assessee from exemption, especially when the audit report is ultimately filed and available to the Assessing Officer.
Competing arguments included the Revenue's reliance on procedural requirements and CBDT Circular No. 16/2024, which directs that delay in filing Form 10BB requires condonation under section 119(2). The assessee argued that the substantive right to exemption should not be denied on account of procedural delay.
The Tribunal gave precedence to the substantive right to exemption over procedural lapses, aligning with judicial precedents, and held that the assessee is entitled to exemption despite the delay.
Issue 2: Obligation to File Condonation Petition under Section 119(2) for Delay in Filing Form 10BB
Section 119(2) empowers the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and the Income Tax Officer to condone delays in compliance of procedural requirements. The Revenue contended that the assessee was required to file a condonation petition for late filing of Form 10BB and failed to do so, justifying the denial of exemption.
The Tribunal acknowledged the Revenue's position and the CBDT Circular No. 16/2024 dated 18.11.2024, which clarifies the procedural remedy available to assessees for delay in filing audit reports. However, the Tribunal emphasized that the power to condone delay lies with the Income Tax Officer and that failure to file a condonation petition does not ipso facto disentitle the assessee from exemption if the substantive conditions are met.
The Tribunal's reasoning reflects a balanced approach, recognizing the procedural remedy but prioritizing the assessee's substantive entitlement to exemption when the audit report is ultimately filed and available before the assessing authorities.
Issue 3: Validity of Disallowance of Income Claimed as Accumulated under Section 11(2)
The assessing authority disallowed a sum of Rs. 25,58,626/- comprising Rs. 5,73,129/- claimed as income accumulated under section 11(2) and Rs. 19,85,497/- claimed as income accumulated for application to charitable purposes, on the ground of non-filing of Form 10BB within the prescribed due date.
The Tribunal analyzed the facts that the audit report was filed, albeit belatedly, and was available at the time of assessment. It relied on judicial pronouncements that procedural delay in filing Form 10BB does not justify denial of exemption if the audit report is ultimately furnished and the assessee fulfills substantive conditions.
The Tribunal directed deletion of the adjustment made by the Assessing Officer and held that the disallowance was not justified.
Significant Holdings
"Filing of Form 10B before one month from the due date of filing of the return of income is not mandatory requirement for the purpose of claiming exemption under sections 11 & 12 of the Act and even if filed at later stage, the assessee is entitled to claim exemption under sections 11 & 12."
"The assessee-Trust is entitled to claim exemption under section 11 of the Act despite the belated filing of Form 10BB audit report, as the audit report was available at the time of processing the return and assessment."
"The power to condone delay in filing Form 10BB lies with the Income Tax Officer under section 119(2) of the Act; however, failure to file a condonation petition does not automatically disentitle the assessee from exemption if substantive conditions are met."
"The disallowance of income claimed as accumulated under section 11(2) on the ground of delay in filing Form 10BB is not justified where the audit report is ultimately filed and available before the assessing authorities."