TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Rejects Petition After 405-Day Delay, Emphasizing Strict Procedural Compliance in Legal Proceedings</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX DELHI Versus HDFC BANK LTD.</h3> SC dismissed SLP due to 405-day delay in filing, explicitly stating 'No case is made out to condone the delay.' Court kept open potential legal questions ... Condonation of inordinate delay of 405 days - Levy of penalty u/s 86 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 - invocation of the Proviso placed in Section 34(1) - HELD THAT:- No case is made out to condone the delay of 405 days in filing the Special Leave Petition. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed on the ground of delay. However, the question of law, if any, is kept open. The Supreme Court, in an order delivered by Hon'ble Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan, dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to an inordinate delay of 405 days in its filing, holding that 'No case is made out to condone the delay.' The Court expressly kept open 'the question of law, if any,' and closed any pending applications. The dismissal was strictly on procedural grounds of delay without addressing the substantive merits.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
