Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether employees' contribution to provident fund and ESI, if deposited before the due date for filing the return, is allowable as a deduction under the Income-tax Act despite delay under the relevant welfare statutes.
Analysis: Employees' contribution recovered from salaries is treated as income under Section 2(24)(x) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and deduction is linked to Section 36(1)(va). The Court followed the settled view that, for the purpose of the Income-tax Act, the assessee is entitled to deduction where the contribution is actually paid before the return is filed. The decisions in P.M. Electronics Ltd. and AIMIL Limited were treated as correctly stating the law, and the distinction sought to be drawn by the Revenue between employer's contribution and employees' contribution was not accepted as a ground to deny relief in the present case.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee, and the disallowance was not sustainable.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's appeal failed because the Tribunal's order allowing deduction for employees' PF and ESI contributions paid before the return-filing date was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Employees' contribution to PF and ESI, though treated as income when deducted from wages, is deductible if actually deposited before filing the return, notwithstanding delayed deposit under the welfare statutes.