ITAT allows Assessee appeal, deletes disallowance under sec 36(1)(va) emphasizing payment timing. The ITAT allowed the Assessee's appeal, directing the deletion of the disallowance under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The ITAT allowed the Assessee's appeal, directing the deletion of the disallowance under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision emphasized the significance of actual payments before the due date of filing the return and upheld the prospective applicability of the amendments introduced by the Finance Act, 2021 from 01st April, 2021 onwards.
Issues: - Disallowance of Rs. 4,90,572 under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 - Applicability of the amendment brought by Finance Act, 2021 in Section 36
Analysis:
Issue 1: Disallowance under section 36(1)(va) The appeal was filed against the order of the CIT(A) confirming the disallowance of Rs. 4,90,572 under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessee argued that the amounts were deposited before the due date of filing the original return, making them allowable under section 43B of the IT Act. The Assessee cited various case laws to support their argument, emphasizing that the actual payment before the due date of filing the return should be considered. The Assessee also referred to the legislative intent highlighted in the case of PCIT Vs. Pro Interactive Service India Pvt. Ltd, indicating that belated payments of PF and ESI should not be treated as deemed income of the employer under section 2(24)(x) of the Act. The Revenue, on the other hand, contended that there was no error in the findings of the Tax Authorities below, citing the judgment in CIT v. Bharat Hotels Ltd (2019) 410 ITR 417 (Delhi) (HC).
Issue 2: Applicability of the amendment brought by Finance Act, 2021 The Assessee raised a ground of appeal regarding the applicability of the amendment brought by the Finance Act, 2021 in Section 36, contending that the amendment is applicable prospectively from 01st April, 2021. The legislature explicitly stated that the amendments would apply to the assessment year 2021-22 and subsequent years. It was highlighted that the amendments were not applicable to assessment years preceding 2021-22. The ITAT Benches in Kolkata, Hyderabad, and Jodhpur, along with the Co-ordinate Bench at Delhi, discussed the applicability of the amendments in various cases, emphasizing that the amendments were not retroactive. The judgment in Pr. CIT Vs. Pro Interactive India Pvt. Ltd reaffirmed the applicability of the amendments in line with the legislative intent, supporting the Assessee's position.
In conclusion, the ITAT allowed the appeal of the Assessee, directing the deletion of the impugned addition. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering the actual payment before the due date of filing the return and upheld the applicability of the amendments brought by the Finance Act, 2021 from 01st April, 2021 onwards.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.