Bail cancellation requires clear proof of fraud, suppression, or misuse of discretion; unsupported allegations will not disturb the order.

Bail once granted will not be recalled or cancelled unless clear material shows misuse of judicial discretion, fraud, or suppression of facts sufficient to vitiate the order. The court found that bail had been granted after considering the totality of circumstances, and no perversity or lack of judicial exercise was shown. Alleged prior involvements were largely unsupported by filed complaints, and some matters concerned only non-appearance to summons. No material misstatement or fraud was established, so the request to recall or cancel bail failed and the existing bail order remained undisturbed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the bail order was liable to be recalled or cancelled on the ground of alleged misstatement, suppression of prior involvements, and alleged fraud upon the Court.

Analysis: The bail had been granted after consideration of the totality of circumstances, and no material was shown to establish that the discretion exercised by the court below was perverse or not judicially exercised. The alleged prior involvements were not supported by filed complaints in most instances, and some matters related only to non-appearance pursuant to summons. The record also did not establish any fraud or material misstatement warranting recall of the bail order.

Conclusion: The request for recall or cancellation of bail was not made out.

Final Conclusion: The challenge to the grant of bail failed, and the existing bail order remained undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: Bail once granted will not be recalled or cancelled absent clear material showing misuse of discretion, fraud, or suppression of facts of such nature as to vitiate the order.

---