2025 (5) TMI 848
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... granting bail to the respondent. 2. It is submitted that the Respondent along with three other persons, had been arrested by the petitioner Department, for fraudulent claim of IGST refund of more than 63 crores. Respondent was remanded to judicial custody and was eventually granted Bail by learned CMM vide Order dated 11.09.2019, which has been confirmed by the learned ASJ. 3. The recall of the Bail order is sought on the ground that the Order is bad in law as well as on tax. 4. The main contention of the Department is that the respondent is involved in many cases of fraud, which fact should have been considered by the learned Trial Court. The details of 10 previous cases showing involvement of the Respondent was recorded in the o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... M/s. Accturist Overseas (OPC) Pvt. Ltd. M/s Horrens Exim, Mis Sparx Exports, M/s Shree Shyam Enterprises 4. DRI (HQ) April 1993 M/s. Chopra Associated Sanjay Gandhi Transport Nagar, New Delhi 5. DRI (HQ) 2014-15 & 2015-16 Fraudulent availment of Duty drawback 6. DRI (HQ) March 2013 M/s Pixels Overseas 7.DRI (HQ) November 2003 M/s Sea Sky Overseas, M/s Global Overseas, Exim International and Lakshay Export 8. DRI (HQ) June 1996 Ramesh Wadhera, Darshan Singh, Muni Lal, Ajay Kumar Arora and Salish Dhingra 9. DRI (HQ) DRI/DZU/23- ENQ/107/2015 M/s Dev International 10. DGGI (HQ) August 2019 M/s. Monal Enterprises 7. It is thus, contended that the Respondent succeeded in ge....
TaxTMI