Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to interest on the delayed refund of VAT and, if so, at what rate and from which date the interest was payable.
Analysis: The refund claim was found to have been validly made under the VAT regime, and the statutory framework provided that refund interest would accrue after ninety days from the date of the refund application. The refund application was filed on 16.09.2020, so interest commenced after the expiry of ninety days and could not be shifted to the later date on which the Department processed the interest claim. The Court also held that the exclusion of time relating to the COVID-19 limitation orders did not apply to the computation of interest on a refund, since the matter concerned payment of money already due and not institution of proceedings. On the facts, the Court further accepted that the petitioner was entitled to enhanced compensation for the delayed use of the money and rejected the Department's reduced-calculation approach.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to interest on the refunded amount for the period of delay, and the applicable rate was 9% per annum, with payment of the differential interest directed after deducting the amount already paid.