Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Writ petition dismissed; Appellate Authority followed Section 107(9) of GST Act, 2017, ensuring fair hearing and no natural justice breach.</h1> The HC of Calcutta dismissed the writ petition, determining that the Appellate Authority complied with Section 107(9) of the GST Act, 2017, by granting ... Violation of principles of natural justice - appellate authority has failed in granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner - HELD THAT:- The appellate authority has strictly adhered to the principles of natural justice by providing the petitioner with opportunity of hearing, as mandated under Section 107(9). This Court finds that the procedural requirements laid down in the said provision have been duly complied with before passing the impugned order. Moreover, this Court notes that all the grounds raised by the petitioner, have been thoroughly examined and considered by the appellate authority while rendering its decision dated 22nd November 2024. There is nothing on record to suggest that any material aspect has been overlooked or that there has been any violation of procedural fairness. Petition dismissed. The High Court of Calcutta in a judgment examined the petitioner's reliance on Section 107(9) of the GST Act, 2017, which mandates the Appellate Authority to grant three adjournments and ensure a proper opportunity for hearing. The court found that the Appellate Authority adhered to the principles of natural justice and considered all grounds raised by the petitioner before dismissing the writ petition for lack of merit. The court concluded that there was no violation of procedural fairness and ordered no costs to be awarded.