https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766670 The appellate authority was found to have afforded the statutory hearing required under Section 107(9) of the CGST Act, and the grounds raised were examined before the order was passed. The Court held that there was no breach of procedural fairness or natural justice, and the appellate order was not vitiated as a non-speaking order because no material issue was left unconsidered. The challenge to the appellate decision therefore failed, and the impugned order was upheld. en-us Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Mar 2025 08:25:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766670 The appellate authority was found to have afforded the statutory hearing required under Section 107(9) of the CGST Act, and the grounds raised were examined before the order was passed. The Court held that there was no breach of procedural fairness or natural justice, and the appellate order was not vitiated as a non-speaking order because no material issue was left unconsidered. The challenge to the appellate decision therefore failed, and the impugned order was upheld. Case-Laws GST Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766670