Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Petitioner Granted Liberty to Approach Trial Court Following HC Order; Special Leave Petition Disposed Of</h1> <h3>MANOJ KUMAR SONI Versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT</h3> The SC declined to interfere with the HC's impugned order. The petitioner was granted liberty to approach the Trial Court in light of subsequent ... Maintainability of proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) in the absence of a scheduled offence - applicant's arrest and subsequent detention - lack of necessary sanction and procedural irregularities - it was held by high Court that 'The prayer for bail made by the applicant under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) read with Section 45 of the PMLA, 2002 for the offences under Section 3 & 4 of the PMLA, 2002, deserves to be and is hereby rejected.' HELD THAT:- There are no ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to move the Trial Court, particularly taking note of the subsequent development. SLP disposed off. The Supreme Court, in a judgment delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice M. M. Sundresh and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal, declined to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court. The petitioner was granted liberty to approach the Trial Court considering subsequent developments. The Special Leave Petition was disposed of with the mentioned liberty, and any pending applications were also disposed of.