TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Special Leave Petition Dismissed; Court Declines to Interfere with Order; All Pending Applications Disposed.</h1> <h3>MOHAMMAD KASHIF Versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT</h3> The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition, opting not to interfere with the impugned order. All pending applications related to the case were disposed ... Seeking grant of bail - Money Laundering - extortion of money by impersonating himself - twin conditions of Section 45 of PMLA, 2002 - it was held by High Court that 'Looking into the facts and circumstances of the case as well as nature and gravity of the offence, it is not inclined to release the applicant on bail.' HELD THAT:- It is not required to interfere with the impugned order. SLP dismissed. The Supreme Court, with Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal presiding, declined to interfere with the impugned order. The Special Leave Petition was dismissed, and any pending application(s) were disposed of accordingly. The legal representatives for the petitioner included Ms. Mukta Gupta, Mr. Nitesh Rana, Mr. Deepak Nagar, Ms. Mithu Jain, Mr. Nikhil Kohli, Mr. Shashwat Jaiswal, Ms. Raksha Tripathy, Mr. Suyash Pandey, Ms. Nitya Gupta, and Ms. Aditi Gupta.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
