Natural justice in customs adjudication requires disclosure of relied-upon documents and cross-examination before adverse findings.

Where adjudication rests on allegations affecting drawback, DEPB credit, confiscation and penalties, fairness requires supply of the relied-upon and seized documents so the noticee can file an effective reply. When statements of foreign nationals are part of the material relied upon, cross-examination of those witnesses is a material safeguard of natural justice. Persistent refusal to provide the documents or permit cross-examination vitiates the hearing and cannot be cured by procedural inconvenience. The proper course is a speaking decision after disclosure of documents, opportunity for cross-examination, and a reasonable hearing.

---

---

Issues: Whether the adjudication orders were vitiated for denial of natural justice by failure to supply relied-upon and other relevant documents and by refusal to permit cross-examination of the foreign nationals whose statements were relied upon.

Analysis: The dispute turned on serious allegations affecting drawback, DEPB credit, confiscation, and penalties, and the defence required access to the documents referred to in the show-cause notice as well as the documents seized from the noticees. The record indicated persistent requests for these materials and for an opportunity to file an effective reply after inspection. The statements of the foreign nationals formed part of the material relied upon, so their cross-examination was a material part of a fair hearing. Procedural difficulty in producing witnesses could not override the requirement of fairness, and the adjudication required a speaking order based on a proper hearing.

Conclusion: The denial of documents and cross-examination amounted to a breach of natural justice, and the adjudication orders were set aside with a remand for fresh decision after supplying documents, permitting cross-examination, and granting a reasonable hearing.

---