Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Form H can be furnished after completion of assessment and treated on par with Form C and Form F under Rule 12(10)(b) of the Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules, 1957.
Analysis: Rule 12(7) permits Forms C and F to be furnished within three months after the relevant period, with a further extension on sufficient cause being shown. Rule 12(10) places a different regime on Form H and contains no proviso analogous to Rule 12(7). Rule 12(10)(b) applies mutatis mutandis only where State Government rules are framed concerning Form H and its use, custody, maintenance, and furnishing. In the absence of such State rules in Andhra Pradesh, that provision does not operate to import the extended time available for Forms C and F into Form H.
Conclusion: Form H cannot be treated as freely receivable beyond the assessment stage merely by applying the mechanism available for Forms C and F under Rule 12(7); the matter was therefore required to be placed before the Chief Justice for reference to a Full Bench.