Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether imported goods described as drugs, and cleared as bulk drugs, were entitled to exemption benefit under the relevant customs notifications, and whether the term "drugs" includes bulk drugs.
Analysis: The dispute related to imports made by a 100% EOU during June 2015 to September 2016. The issue was held to be covered by an earlier decision which had already considered the scope of the notification entries for drugs and medicines. The reasoning adopted was that bulk drugs fall within the expression drugs, and where the imported goods are specifically covered by the notification entry, the exemption cannot be denied merely because of the description used at import stage. The matter was treated as no longer res integra.
Conclusion: The benefit of the exemption was available to the appellant, and the adverse order was set aside.