Probation in tax prosecution upheld where conviction stood and advanced age supported relief under the offenders law.

Conviction for wilful attempt to evade tax and for false statements in verification was not disturbed, as the trial court had appreciated the evidence and recorded guilt under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The High Court held that granting benefit under section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 was not illegal, particularly because the respondents were women of advanced age. It also noted that, since the respondents had not filed any appeal against conviction, their acquittal could not be considered in the revenue's appeal. The challenge to the sentence therefore failed and the probation order was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether the conviction for offences under the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be disturbed and whether the benefit of probation granted by the trial court was liable to be interfered with in the revenue's appeal.

Analysis: The respondents had been convicted for wilful attempt to evade tax and for making false statements in verification. The High Court noted that the trial court had appreciated the evidence and recorded conviction, and that the respondents were women of advanced age. In those circumstances, the grant of benefit under section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 was held not to be illegal. The Court also noted that the respondents had not filed any appeal against conviction, so their acquittal could not be considered in the revenue's appeal.

Conclusion: The challenge to the sentence failed and the benefit of probation was upheld. The conviction was not disturbed, and the appeal was dismissed.

---