Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Petition dismissed where petitioners accepted monthly instalment payments and later sought penalty waiver, claim cannot be reopened The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition and declined to interfere with the HC's order, holding that the petitioners had acquiesced in earlier ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Petition dismissed where petitioners accepted monthly instalment payments and later sought penalty waiver, claim cannot be reopened
The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition and declined to interfere with the HC's order, holding that the petitioners had acquiesced in earlier authorities' orders by seeking payment by monthly instalments and had not sought penalty waiver at that time. Having subsequently made the payments, their later claim for waiver could not be reopened, so the impugned order was left undisturbed.
The Supreme Court of India, with Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan presiding, reviewed the Special Leave Petition filed by the petitioner, represented by Mr. Alok Yadav and his team. After considering the arguments and the materials on record, the Court found no justification to interfere with the impugned order issued by the High Court. Consequently, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed, and any pending applications were disposed of.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.