https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765248 The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition and declined to interfere with the HC's order, holding that the petitioners had acquiesced in earlier authorities' orders by seeking payment by monthly instalments and had not sought penalty waiver at that time. Having subsequently made the payments, their later claim for waiver could not be reopened, so the impugned order was left undisturbed. en-us Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Sep 2025 13:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765248 The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition and declined to interfere with the HC's order, holding that the petitioners had acquiesced in earlier authorities' orders by seeking payment by monthly instalments and had not sought penalty waiver at that time. Having subsequently made the payments, their later claim for waiver could not be reopened, so the impugned order was left undisturbed. Case-Laws GST Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=765248