Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the additions made on account of alleged bogus purchases, bogus sales and presumed commission income were sustainable where the Assessing Officer treated the transactions as ingenuine but retained the returned income and financial results without rejecting the books or reworking the actual income.
Analysis: The seized material and statements were relied upon to conclude that certain purchases and sales were not genuine. However, the assessment proceeded on the footing that the returned income and book results remained intact while simultaneously making additions for presumed commission from the same alleged bogus transactions. This approach was found internally inconsistent. If the transactions were to be treated as bogus, the true income had to be recomputed on that basis rather than by accepting the declared results and making an additional presumption of commission. The reasoning that the Revenue cannot accept one part of the transaction for assessment purposes and reject the corresponding part for another purpose was applied. On that footing, the additions were not justified.
Conclusion: The additions were deleted and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.