TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>SC Dismisses Special Leave Petition; Observations in Impugned Judgment Won't Affect Future Proceedings; Pending Applications Disposed.</h1> <h3>DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT Versus CHANDRA PRAKASH KHANDELWAL</h3> The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition, choosing not to interfere with the impugned order due to the passage of time. The Court clarified that the ... Seeking grant of bail - money laundering - proceeds of crime - it is alleged that petitioner was involved in dealing with the proceeds of crime and in transferring of funds of M/s. PACL through various companies and making transactions of purchasing of properties etc. - it was held by High Court that 'The petitioner herein is admitted on bail on his executing a personal bond of Rs.25.00 lacs with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court and subject to conditions imposed'. HELD THAT:- It is not required to interfere with the impugned order. Although it is made clear that the observations made in the impugned judgment will not have any bearing on any further proceedings. SLP dismissed. The Supreme Court, presided over by Hon'ble Justices M.M. Sundresh and Aravind Kumar, heard arguments from both parties' counsel. The Court decided not to interfere with the impugned order due to the passage of time. It clarified that the observations in the impugned judgment would not affect any future proceedings. Consequently, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed, and any pending applications were disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
