Genuine short term capital losses can offset long term capital gains when transactions are legitimate and not sham arrangements.

The ITAT Mumbai held that genuine short term capital losses from share transactions can be set off against long term capital gains when transactions are legitimate and not sham. The AO cannot prevent such set-off by alleging colorable device without evidence of non-genuineness. The assessee is entitled to arrange affairs within legal framework to reduce tax liability. The AO had accepted the computation of capital loss and nature of transactions, and had accepted similar long term capital gains in subsequent assessment years. Appeal decided against revenue.

---

---

Issues:
Set off of short term capital loss against long term capital gain.

Analysis:
The appeal and cross objection arose from an order by the National Faceless Appeal Centre regarding the set off of short term capital loss against long term capital gain for the Assessment Year 2016-17. The Revenue raised concerns regarding the deletion of disallowance on account of short term capital loss on the sale of shares without appreciating the alleged tax planning aspect. The Assessing Officer contended that the taxpayer used a colorable device to reduce tax liability by selling shares of a company that issued bonus shares, resulting in a short term capital loss. The First Appellate Authority, however, ruled in favor of the taxpayer, allowing the set off of the short term capital loss against the long term capital gain.

Upon review, the Tribunal found that the transactions were genuine, and there was no evidence of sham transactions. The Tribunal disagreed with the Assessing Officer's allegation of tax avoidance through a colorable device, stating that as long as the taxpayer operates within the legal framework to reduce tax liability, the Assessing Officer cannot prevent it. The Tribunal emphasized that there was no requirement for the taxpayer to pay more tax than legally obligated. Additionally, since there was no doubt about the genuineness of the transactions and the nature of the loss, the Tribunal upheld the decision of the First Appellate Authority to allow the set off. The Tribunal also noted that the long term capital gain from the sale of bonus shares had been accepted in subsequent assessment years.

The Tribunal referenced a decision by the Jurisdictional High Court to support its conclusion. Ultimately, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision to allow the set off of the short term capital loss against the long term capital gain. Consequently, the cross objection by the assessee was also dismissed as it was in support of the First Appellate Authority's order. The appeal and cross objection were both dismissed, and the order was pronounced in open court on the specified date.

---