Service tax applies only to amounts for actual service provision, not general performance incentives under Section 67

CESTAT NEW Delhi held that service tax is chargeable only on amounts representing consideration for actual service provision. The tribunal distinguished between transaction-specific commission and performance-based incentives, ruling that incentives paid for general performance rather than particular transactions are not taxable under Section 67 of Finance Act, 1994. Following SC precedent in Union of India v. Intercontinental Consultancy and Technocrats and larger bench decision in Kafila Hospitality Travels, the tribunal set aside the demand and allowed the appeal.

---

---

Issues:
1. Whether the demand of service tax on the retained amount collected in the name of ocean freight is valid.
2. Whether the demand of service tax on commission/brokerage received by the appellant is justified.

Analysis:

Issue 1:
The appellant, registered for providing taxable services, collected an amount higher than the actual ocean freight paid to shipping lines. The department alleged this amount as consideration towards taxable services. A show cause notice proposed service tax on the retained amount, which was confirmed initially but set aside in an appeal. The department was in appeal against this order but withdrew it due to monetary limit instructions. The present appeal challenges the service tax demand on the retained amount. The Tribunal referred to precedents where it was held that service tax is not leviable on ocean freight and that the differential freight amount should not be taxed. The Tribunal concurred with these findings, leading to setting aside the demand on the differential freight amount.

Issue 2:
The appellant also received commission/brokerage from shipping lines, on which service tax was proposed but not paid. The Tribunal referred to Section 67 of the Finance Act, which states that only the gross amount charged for providing the service is subject to service tax. The Supreme Court's interpretation emphasized that the value subject to service tax should be transaction-specific. Incentives, like commission, are not related to a particular transaction and are not considered taxable under Section 67. The Tribunal cited a previous case where incentives for achieving targets were held not liable to service tax. Applying similar reasoning, the Tribunal set aside the demand on commission/brokerage, aligning with the previous decision.

In conclusion, the Tribunal set aside the demands on both the retained amount collected in the name of ocean freight and the commission/brokerage received by the appellant, based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and precedents.

---