Motor vehicle name plates and logos treated as accessories, not plastic articles, for excise classification

Plastic name plates, labels, emblems and logos used on motor vehicles were treated as accessories rather than mere articles of plastic because an accessory is supplementary or subordinate and need not be essential for the vehicle's functioning. The goods were found to add convenience, identity, effectiveness and value to the vehicles, bringing them within the broader description of parts and accessories under Chapters 87.08 and 87.14. The contrary classification under Chapter 3926.90 was rejected, and the assessee's classification was accepted in line with the Supreme Court's ruling in its own case.

---

---

Issues: Whether plastic name plates, labels, emblems and logos used on motor vehicles, motorcycles, scooters and mopeds are classifiable as parts or accessories under Chapter sub-headings 87.08 and 87.14 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, or as other articles of plastics under Chapter sub-heading 3926.90.

Analysis: The controlling principle applied was that an accessory is something supplementary or subordinate and need not be essential for the actual functioning of the product. The goods in question were found to add convenience, identity, effectiveness and value to the vehicle, and therefore answered the broader description of accessories. In view of the binding ruling of the Supreme Court in the assessee's own case, the earlier contrary view no longer survived.

Conclusion: The goods were held to be parts and accessories of motor vehicles and were classifiable under Chapter sub-headings 87.08 and 87.14, not under Chapter sub-heading 3926.90. The classification adopted by the lower authorities was set aside and the assessee's classification was accepted.

---