Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent was ineligible to make a declaration under the Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme on the ground that an audit report had already quantified the service tax dues and a show cause notice had been issued in respect of part of the liability before the cut-off date.
Analysis: The scheme under Section 106 of the Finance Act, 2013 permits declaration only where no notice or order of determination under Sections 72, 73 or 73A of the Finance Act, 1994 had been issued or made before 1 March 2013. An audit report does not amount to an order of determination under those provisions. The show cause notice referred to in the record was limited to dues relating to medical insurance services and did not cover the dues comprised in the declaration. The declaration was, therefore, not hit by the statutory disqualification and the view taken by the Tribunal required no interference.
Conclusion: The respondent was not ineligible to avail the scheme on the facts of the case, and the appeal was liable to be dismissed.