Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the bank accounts of a former director could be attached for recovery of the company's VAT dues before the company was wound up and in the absence of statutory authority.
Analysis: Section 83(3) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 fastens joint and several liability on a director only when a private company is wound up and the tax, interest, or penalty cannot be recovered from the company. The company in question remained functional, its appeal was pending, and the petitioner was no longer a director. In these circumstances, recovery could not be directed against the petitioner's personal bank accounts. The attachment was also found to be an arbitrary exercise of power and wholly without authority.
Conclusion: The attachment of the petitioner's saving bank accounts and the notice dated 12.02.2021 were illegal and were quashed. The petitioner was entitled to compensation by way of penal cost for wrongful attachment.