Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the discount allowed to distributors on prepaid mobile services constituted commission or brokerage so as to attract deduction of tax at source under Section 194H of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The dispute was covered by the binding Supreme Court ruling that the income or profit component arising from sale or transfer of prepaid coupons or starter-kits to distributors does not give rise to a legal obligation to deduct tax at source under Section 194H. The order under challenge of the Tribunal, which had held the provision inapplicable, was affirmed.
Conclusion: The discount to the distributors was not commission or brokerage within the meaning of Section 194H, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Discount allowed to distributors on prepaid mobile services does not amount to commission or brokerage attracting tax deduction at source under Section 194H of the Income-tax Act, 1961.