Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order, passed without affording a reasonable opportunity and personal hearing, was liable to be quashed and the matter remanded with conditions.
Analysis: The assessment demand arose from a mismatch between the GSTR 3B returns and the auto-populated GSTR 2A returns. The order disclosed that the petitioner was not heard before it was issued. Although the petitioner had failed to monitor the GST portal despite being a registered person, the denial of hearing warranted interference. The matter was therefore required to be reconsidered after granting an opportunity to reply and a personal hearing, with the petitioner being put on terms by requiring payment of 10% of the disputed demand.
Conclusion: The assessment order was quashed and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration subject to deposit of 10% of the disputed tax demand, with consequential lifting of the bank attachment.